|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on May 3, 2006 15:50:08 GMT -1
Me and Ayce_123 had a bit of a dispute about this in school, he says the Beatles but I say the Stones.
Who do you prefer?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on May 3, 2006 15:58:41 GMT -1
I dunno, actually. The Beatles were pretty much THE inspiration to bands like Metallica, plus Mr. P likes them  Oh ya, and STRAWBERRY FIELDS FOREVER, MOFO'ERS. |
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on May 3, 2006 15:59:28 GMT -1
The Rolling Stones own, everyone likes The Beatles but I just don't care about them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on May 3, 2006 16:02:00 GMT -1
The Beatles, in my opinion, sound poppy and old-fashioned quite frankly.
|
|
|
|
Post by el pogo loco on May 3, 2006 16:03:54 GMT -1
i gotta say the beatles, not sure why...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on May 3, 2006 16:04:15 GMT -1
To add to the bad points to The Beatles, they wear their guitars too high, quite silly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on May 3, 2006 16:05:32 GMT -1
Have any of you lads even heard "Satisfaction" by the Stones? Destroys any song the Beatles ever made in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on May 3, 2006 16:08:41 GMT -1
Jumpin' Jack Flash is an amazing song... Much better IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by S¢σσву on May 3, 2006 16:27:42 GMT -1
Stones.. as u said deadshot, Beatles are really old fashioned
|
|
Ayce_13
Junkie
".....Ayce."
Posts: 263
|
Post by Ayce_13 on May 3, 2006 16:34:37 GMT -1
oh c'mon here people, i'm not a huge fan of either of them but the beatles have the edge, mainly because they did inspire most bands of today. Velocity, im suprised, u say rolling stones even after u read the anthony keidis autobiography? in the words of keidis himself, the fans of rolling stones are people like lawyers n stuff who, lets face it, dont know the meaning of rock. i actually have a stones album here sumwhere, im going to burn it as soon as i see it  |
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on May 3, 2006 16:39:17 GMT -1
Maybe so... But The Rolling Stones are better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Becky :) on May 3, 2006 16:49:58 GMT -1
The Beatles....
Can't give a reason though =]]
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on May 3, 2006 18:29:02 GMT -1
If you notice, the majority of people who said The Beatles either can't give a reason or just purely don't know why...
Which I think (I could be wrong) is because they know the Beatles are maybe even more popular than the Stones so they're just going with the croud.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on May 3, 2006 18:46:45 GMT -1
I think it's mainly because most bands (when stating their inspirations for starting their band) are the Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by el pogo loco on May 3, 2006 21:02:08 GMT -1
well i voted the beatles when they only had 1 vote, and the stones had 2 i think, but i actually like the beatles better than the stones. must have been cos i fell off of the human pyramid last week!
|
|
Oh ya, and STRAWBERRY FIELDS FOREVER, MOFO'ERS.
