|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on Mar 1, 2006 15:42:04 GMT -1
Noty trying to sound like a c*ck but having a huge amount of layers doesn't necessarily mean it's gonna be a brilliant signature  But yeah, that one looks good, the text doesn't jump out at you which is good. |
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 1, 2006 15:43:55 GMT -1
Maybe not but, shows I worked hard.
|
|
Ayce_13
Junkie
".....Ayce."
Posts: 263
|
Post by Ayce_13 on Mar 3, 2006 21:50:50 GMT -1
THE FIELDY ONE ROCKS MAN!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 21, 2006 20:19:03 GMT -1
Updated with my new Mastercheif sig.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Mar 21, 2006 20:24:19 GMT -1
It's good, like. But the glare from the lens flare spoils it completely.
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 21, 2006 20:53:19 GMT -1
Maybe I should stop doing lens flares over my sigs, I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by S¢σσву on Mar 21, 2006 20:57:28 GMT -1
Very sweet sig man.. i like alot..
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Tr1st@Inactive. on Mar 21, 2006 21:11:28 GMT -1
Love it but the lens flare does spoil it =\
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on Mar 22, 2006 15:45:35 GMT -1
It's good, like. But the glare from the lens flare spoils it completely. Yeah I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by pezzer123 on Mar 22, 2006 19:54:11 GMT -1
still amzing though.
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 25, 2006 15:04:33 GMT -1
Updated with my new tag.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on Mar 25, 2006 15:06:37 GMT -1
Lens flare again I see.
Pretty nice sig, the right side looks like a stain-glass window.
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 25, 2006 15:09:08 GMT -1
I felt with this sig it needed to be quite light, that's the only reason I used em.
Forgot to mention, thanks for all the comments on my previous sigs guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cerpin Taxt on Mar 25, 2006 15:10:35 GMT -1
Did you use a blending mode (Overlay, Lighten etc.) on your text?
If so what one?
Because I can't tell if it's just a lowered opacity or a blending mode.
|
|
|
|
Post by V e l o c i t y on Mar 25, 2006 15:13:04 GMT -1
Lowered opacity.
|
|
